Voir la source de Alizarin Rudiments Simplified

While in one condition participants were required to choose the order of information acquisition, in the second condition they were required to only choose one of these two pieces of information. By confining the available information to either how much they will gain or how fair the offer is, we were able to directly examine whether participants preferred to base their decision solely on more economic or more social information. Method Participants and Task Forty-four undergraduates from Duke University (average age = 21.8 years; 25 females) participated in the experiment as responders for monetary payoff. Participants received $5 as show up fee and a bonus payment according to their decisions in the game. The task was identical to the ultimatum game in Experiment 2, with the exception that the only available [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alizarin Alizarin] information was the percentage split of the total amount between them and the other player and the absolute amount of money that was offered to them. In addition, participants [http://www.selleckchem.com/products/qnz-evp4593.html EVP4593 solubility dmso] were required to make their decisions as quickly as possible, and the time they spent on each type of information was recorded by the computer program. Participants were randomly assigned to one of the two between-subjects conditions. In the sequential condition (n = 26), participants were required to select which information they wanted to see first and which to see second, but they could examine both types of information. In the choose-one condition (n = 18), participants were required to select which information they wanted to see, but they could only examine one type of information. The Ethics committee of Duke University approved this study. Results The acceptance rates of each split are illustrated in Figure ?Figure3.3. As in Experiments 1 and 2, the majority of fair proposals were accepted, and [http://www.selleckchem.com/products/VX-765.html selleck chemicals llc] acceptance rates decreased as the offers became less fair. A 5 (split) �� 2 (sequential versus choose-one) repeated measures ANOVA revealed a significant main effect for split on acceptance rates [F(4,168) = 115.047, p