<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="http://www.feuxdelamour.com/v4/skins/common/feed.css?303"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="fr">
		<id>http://www.feuxdelamour.com/v4/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=A_Vismodegib_Capture_Method</id>
		<title>A Vismodegib Capture Method - Historique des versions</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.feuxdelamour.com/v4/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=A_Vismodegib_Capture_Method"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.feuxdelamour.com/v4/index.php?title=A_Vismodegib_Capture_Method&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-04-17T16:42:40Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Historique pour cette page sur le wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.20alpha</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.feuxdelamour.com/v4/index.php?title=A_Vismodegib_Capture_Method&amp;diff=30929&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Cloth59butter : Page créée avec « (A) experimental data. ... An RPP increase from 95?mm Hg to 195?mm Hg in the passive WT group increased afferent diameter significantly from 21.1?��?1.1 to 24.0?��... »</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.feuxdelamour.com/v4/index.php?title=A_Vismodegib_Capture_Method&amp;diff=30929&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2016-10-14T15:32:44Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Page créée avec « (A) experimental data. ... An RPP increase from 95?mm Hg to 195?mm Hg in the passive WT group increased afferent diameter significantly from 21.1?��?1.1 to 24.0?��... »&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Nouvelle page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;(A) experimental data. ... An RPP increase from 95?mm Hg to 195?mm Hg in the passive WT group increased afferent diameter significantly from 21.1?��?1.1 to 24.0?��?1.2?��m (Fig.?(Fig.2A,2A, gray curve). The overall slope of the passive curve was 0.022?��?0.004?��m/mm [http://www.selleckchem.com/products/GDC-0449.html http://www.selleckchem.com/products/GDC-0449.html] Hg, which was significantly different from the slope of the active curve (Table?(Table2;2; P? interval we estimate is found in the mid to distal part of the AA, when increasing the RPP over the experimental range given in Figure?Figure2A.2A. This range (95 �C 195?mm Hg) is indicated with the thin lines in 2B. Using the structural data shown in Table?Table11 () a reasonable fit (black curve) to the active experimental curve is found using a stress sensitivity of a?=?0.23. Also the simulated passive curve shows slight dilation over the pressure range. C57Bl/6 mice To evaluate any [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casein_kinase_2 Casein kinase 2] effect of the mixed genetic background of the mice used in this study we also used commercially available C57Bl/6 mice. We compared active and passive baseline diameters as well as active and passive responses to acute step-wise increases in RPP from 95?mm Hg to 195 (n?=?5). In no case were the results significantly different from those found in the WT group (please see Table?Table2),2), showing that our WT mice are comparable to commercially available C57Bl/6. Papillectomized WT mice In papillectomized kidneys from WT mice (group 4) the afferent autoregulatory response is driven by the myogenic response alone as papillectomy removes the TGF response. In this group the pressure steps [http://www.selleckchem.com/products/Trichostatin-A.html Trichostatin A] from 95?mm Hg to 195?mm Hg significantly reduced active afferent arteriolar diameter only at 175?mm Hg (Fig.?(Fig.3A3A black curve). However, the overall slope of the autoregulation curve was ?0.017?��m/mm Hg ��0.011 indicating that the myogenic response is still active and reduces afferent diameter in response to pressure increases. The slope was significantly different from that found in the WT group (see Table?Table2)2) suggesting reduced afferent autoregulatory capacity. In the passive papillectomized group (10?��mol/L nifedipine) afferent diameter increased from 26.5?��?1.2?��m at 95?mm Hg to 28.0?��?1.1?��m at 195?mm Hg (Fig.?(Fig.3A,3A, gray curve). The slope of the passive curve was 0.018?��?0.006?��m/mm Hg which was significantly different from the active curve (P?&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cloth59butter</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>