5 Critical Functions On 3-deazaneplanocin A
A significant interaction between Set size and Target was also found for reaction time [F(2, 126) = 3.64, MSE = 8039.09, p = 0.03]; post-hoc pairwise comparisons indicated the same pattern of effect of Set size on RTs for both target absent and target present trial types (all p ?Tables3,3, ?,4).4). Two significant three way interactions for percent correct were also found. An interaction among Set size, Target and Sex [F(2, 126) = 3.48, p = 0.035] revealed the above reported decrease in percent correct performance across working memory set size increase for women, regardless of Target. In contrast, for men, a decrease in accuracy was found between Set 2 and Set 6 for both Target types, but only between Set 4 and Ro3280 Set 6 when the Target was present in the working memory set. (Target Absent: Set 2: 93%, Set 4: 75%, Set 6: 69%; Target Present: Set 2: 91%, Set Erastin clinical trial 4: 90%, Set 6: 82%). Similarly, the interaction between Session, Set size and Sex [F(2, 126) = 3.33, p = 0.04] revealed the above described decrease in accuracy across Set size for women, regardless of session, but not for men (Session 1: Set 2 > Set 4, p Set 6, p Set 6, p = 0.007; Set 4 > Set 6, p = 0.006; mean percent correct is presented collapsed across target type in Table ?Table44). A significant practice effect for mean RT indicated that participants were faster at 24-h than at baseline (MRT 24?h �� SE = 780.77 �� 14.31 ms, MRT baseline �� SE = 838.54 �� 13.77 ms, p 3-deazaneplanocin A molecular weight (0.795), whereas the ICC scores for the set size slope and mean percent of correct responses (MPC) fell below the Good range (0.623 and 0.417, respectively). Visual search Mixed factor ANOVAs on mean reaction time including the task variable of Set Size (6, 12, and 18) were performed for each Search Type (feature, conjunction) separately. In the feature search task, a significant main effect of Set Size was found; RTs were faster for the smallest set than the two larger set sizes, which did not differ [F(2, 188) = 7.46, MSE = 1504.13, p
