Take It Easy And Rest As You Are Grasping The Strategies Of RAD001

There was no evidence for a main effect of experiment on RT or accuracy, indicating that no shift in speed-accuracy trade-off was induced by our manipulation (Fs Selleck RAD001 As Figure ?Figure2B2B shows, the dilation patterns in Experiment 3 mirrored the effects observed in Experiment 2. Congruency effects were observed in the flanker task [F(1,23) = 26.5, p pupil dilation results in Experiment 3 to Experiment 2, running NLG-8189 an additional ANOVA with experiment as a between-subject factor. This analyses confirmed the previous congruency effect, F(1,44) = 10.1, p = 0.003, MSE = 0.001, and also revealed main effects of task, F(1,44) = 32.2, p 17-DMAG (Alvespimycin) HCl F(1,44) = 1.6, p = 0.208, MSE = 0.001. Relationship between Perceived Task Difficulty and Conflict Adaptation In order to test whether the assumed increase in difficulty in this Experiment produced a shift to the right side of the inverted U-shape between difficulty and conflict adaptation, we again regressed individual task difficulty ratings on individual scores of conflict adaptation separately for the flanker task and the Stroop task. Interestingly, there was a significant negative linear relationship between task difficulty and conflict adaptation on the flanker task, R2 = 0.174, F(1,22) = 4.6, p = 0.043, see Figure ?Figure4B4B, but no evidence for an effect on the Stroop task (Fs