Techniques To Face RGFP966 Before It's Far Too Late

34, 95% CI: 2.99�C50.96, P = 0.001). and thus we did not enter both dependence and morning drinking into the same model, but ran two MLR models: first with age, domestic violence and dependence as predictor variables and the second with age, domestic violence and morning drinking (reported by women) as predictor variables. The model with ��probable dependence�� was not significant (P = 0.056) and was weaker (pseudo R2 = 0.0668), while the second (with age, domestic violence and morning drinking) was significant. Therefore we report the second model in detail in the manuscript.]. There was a significant correlation between men's morning drinking as reported by the men (for AUDIT question number 6) and by the women (chi squared: 10.975, P Pifithrin-�� chemical structure = 0.027). Table?2. Factors associated with current episode of depression PDK4 in univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses ARPs of the husband as indexed by an AUDIT score of 8 or more (unadjusted OR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.33, 2.15, P = 0.715), or the past history of depression reported by women (unadjusted OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 0.47, 2.82, P = 0.758) were not significant predictors of current MDD. However, there was an intercorrelation between presence of ARPs and domestic violence. Men with ARPs were 2.7 times more likely to get into arguments or commit domestic violence (odds ratio = 2.72, 95% CI: 1.01, 7.36, P = 0.048). The final multiple regression model containing age, morning drinking and domestic violence explained 15% of the variation in occurrence or non-occurrence of MDD (pseudo R2 = 14.87, P Selleckchem RGFP966 = 2.29, 95% CI: 0.95, 5.48; P = 0.062). When we examined the subgroup of women whose husbands had ARPs (i.e. AUDIT score of 8 or more), prevalence of MDD was 40.5% when they were subjected to domestic violence while the prevalence was 18.5% when they were not subjected to domestic violence. DISCUSSION The association between MDD in women and the alcohol use among their spouses has to be interpreted in the context of our study population, which is a rural community, in which a large majority of men consumed alcohol and had ARPs to different extents, and a large majority (81%) of the women were not employed and thus financially dependent. The community we studied is not representative of the general population in Sri Lanka in terms of alcohol consumption and associated problems and thus has limitations in generalizability.