The Formula Powering Dipivefrine

Fig. 3 Setup for pull-out strength study. 5. Statistical analyses Statistical comparisons were made using MINITAB Release 16 Statistical Software (Minitab Inc., State College, PA, USA). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's Honestly Significant Difference multiple comparison tests was used. A p-value CX-5461 research buy factor and their interaction effect on the pull-out values in single and two screw constructs. In the single screw configuration, density, insertion angle and reinsertion had significant effects on pull-out strength of pedicle screw (all pGPCR & G Protein inhibitor angle contributed to 9% of pull-out strength. Reinsertion contributed 2% and the remainder was contributed by interaction effects. Fig. 4 Percentage contribution ratio of factors effecting pull-out strength. In the two screw and rod configuration, density and insertion angle had significant effects on pull-out strength of pedicle screw (both p0.05). In the two screw configuration, density had the highest contribution at 92% followed by insertion angle at 2%. Reinsertion and other interaction effects each contributed Dipivefrine two screw configuration (0.841��0.20 kN). Fig. 5 Effect of density on pull-out strength of pedicle screw. IQR, interquartile range. 2. Effect of insertion angle on pull-out strength The effect of insertion angle on pull-out strength of pedicle screw is presented in Fig. 6A. In the single screw configuration, the pull-out strength was highest in axial pull-out condition and decreased with increasing screw insertion angle. The pull-out value decreased by 52% between insertion angles of 0�� (0.816��0.42 kN) and 30�� (0.536��0.32 kN).