Young Kids, Careers Coupled With Megestrol Acetate

The average signed timing error of all performances during the synchronization phase was close to zero (M = 0.0077, SD = 0.032). Figure ?Figure5A5A (solid line) shows that all participants were able to play the melodies together with the metronome click in all three tempi. A Two-Way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) on timing error by tempo condition (metronome IOI = 250 ms, 178.6 ms, 144.2 ms) and synchronization condition (with metronome = synchronization, without metronome = continuation) indicated a significant main effect of tempo [F(2, 34) = 13.23, p Megestrol Acetate have been reported find more for performances on other instruments (e.g., piano performance, Goebl and Palmer 2013). The overall temporal precision of the played sequences CV = (SDIOI/MeanIOI) was high (mean CV = 0.11). The same Two-Way ANOVA was calculated for the CV and revealed a significant main effect of synchronization condition [F(1, 17) = 19.61, p playing conditions. When playing with metronome click (synchronization phase, solid line) and without metronome click (continuation phase, dashed line). Error bars show ... 2.2.2. Timing with multiple effectors The melodies (Figure ?(Figure1)1) were designed to consist of three distinct parts which had to be played with the fingers only (legato), the tongue only (portato note repetition), and with tongue and fingers in a coordinated fashion (descending and ascending note sequence in portato articulation). For this analysis we restricted our data set to legato and portato recordings, because the onset detection for staccato melodies was less robust. GSK2118436 mw We grouped parts of the melodies according to the effectors required for playing and compared onset timing between these parts. A Two-Way repeated measures ANOVA on timing error by effector combination and tempo, indicated a significant main effect of the executing effector [F(2, 34) = 25.05, p